1 Judaism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Talmudhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_BibleWhere Judaism, Christianity and Islam are based on ;The Old Testament in the light of the ancient East - manual of Biblical archaeology
https://archive.org/stream/diepanbabylonist00jereuoft Die Panbabylonisten der alte Orient und die Aegyptische Religion
https://archive.org/details/oldtestamentinli01jere I The Old Testament in the light of the ancient East : manual of Biblical archaeology by Jeremias, Alfred, 1864-1935,Publication date 1911
https://archive.org/details/oldtestamentinli2jere II The Old Testament in the light of the ancient East
by Jeremias, Alfred, 1864-1935; Johns, C. H. W. (Claude Hermann Walter), 1857-1920; Beaumont, C. L., Mrs., tr Publication date 1911
https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.537237Ancient Hebrew Seals by Reifenberg, A.Publication date 1948 and where they copied it from
------------------------------------
Shlomo Sand de invention of the Jewish people
http://www.rafapal.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Shlomo-Sand-The-Invention-of-the-Jewish-People-2009.pdfhttps://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/apr/18/invention-land-israel-shlomo-sandThe non-excisting secular Jew is his 3rd
hebrew goddess
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B96SdDtRAES6NDk4N2FlYWItNmZlYS00M2Q5LWIyOTktYTM1Yzg5OThjZjQ3/edit?num=50&sort=name&ddrp=1&layout=list&pli=1religion of the Semites
http://www.etana.org/sites/default/files/coretexts/14467.pdfSemitic is NOT a race-, and NOT a faith/believe definition but a LANGUAGE defenition so anti-semetic meaning anti-jew or even anti-israeli has NO meaning whatsoever.. And Jew is not a race either, it's a religion !
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_languages https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semitic_people https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Semitic-speaking_peoplesThe Bible and archaeology
Main articles: The Bible and history
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_history The Bible and history and Biblical archaeology
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_archaeology According to one of the world'ss leading biblical archaeologists, William G. Dever
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_G._Dever Archaeology certainly doesn't prove literal readings of the Bible;It calls them into question, and thats what bothers some people. Most people really think that archaeology is out there to prove the Bible. No archaeologist thinks so.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-34 From the beginnings of what we call biblical archeology, perhaps 150 years ago, scholars, mostly western scholars, have attempted to use archeological data to prove the Bible. And for a long time it was thought to work. William F. Albright
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Albright, the great father of our discipline, often spoke of the “archeological revolution.Well, the revolution has come but not in the way that Albright thought. The truth of the matter today is that archeology raises more questions about the historicity of the Hebrew Bible and even the New Testament than it provides answers, and thats very disturbing to some people.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-35 Dever also wrote:
Archaeology as it is practiced today must be able to challenge, as well as confirm, the Bible stories. Some things described there really did happen, but others did not. The biblical narratives about Abraham
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abrahamhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moseshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joshuahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonprobably reflect some historical memories of people and places, but the larger than life portraits of the Bible are unrealistic and contradicted by the archaeological evidence.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-36I am not reading the Bible as Scripture… I am in fact not even a theist. My view all along—and especially in the recent books—is first that the biblical narratives are indeed stories, often fictional and almost always propagandistic, but that here and there they contain some valid historical information
--------------------------------------------
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-37 Tel Aviv University
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tel_Aviv_University archaeologist Ze'ev Herzog
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ze%27ev_Herzog wrote in the Haaretz
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haaretz newspaper:
This is what archaeologists have learned from their excavations in the Land of Israel: the Israelites were never in Egypt, did not wander in the desert, did not conquer the land in a military campaign and did not pass it on to the 12 tribes of Israel. Perhaps even harder to swallow is that the united monarchy of David and Solomon, which is described by the Bible as a regional power, was at most a small tribal kingdom. And it will come as an unpleasant shock to many that the God of Israel, EL later YHWH, had a female consort (Aserah) and that the early Israelite religion adopted monotheism only in the waning period of the monarchy and not at Mount Sinai.
see
http://www.aeongoddess.com/index.php?topic=188136.0Archeology on "Jewish" Bible, no evidence | Bible remove from jewish bookshelf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-38 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-39 Professor Israel Finkelstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel_Finkelstein who is known as the father of biblical archaeology, told the Jerusalem Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jerusalem_Post that Jewish archaeologists have found no historical or archaeological evidence to back the biblical narrative on The Exodus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodus the Jews wandering in Sinai or Book of Joshua
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Joshua conquest of Canaan. On the alleged Temple of Solomon, Finkelstein said that there is no archaeological evidence to prove it really existed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-middleeastmonitor.org.uk-40 Professor Yoni Mizrahi, an independent archaeologist who has worked with the International Atomic Energy Agency, agreed with Israel Finkelstein
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-middleeastmonitor.org.uk-40 Regarding The Exodus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exodusof Israelites from Egypt,
Egyptian archaeologist Zahi Hawass
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zahi_Hawass said:
“Really, it’s a myth. This is my career as an archaeologist. I should tell them the truth. If the people are upset, that is not my problem.”
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible#cite_note-41More critical scholars see the nativity stories either as completely fictional accounts,[40] or at least constructed from traditions that predate the Gospels.
http://www.aeongoddess.com/index.php?topic=188184.0 So Palestine is NOT the Holy Land of Jews - Israeli's, THEY are not the chosen ones. And no SUMER is not Israel!
