1 Op. cit., p. 598. 2 Op. cit., pp. 159-60.
' W. H. Dall {Alaska and its Resources, p. 381) says that if a Chukchee
wife bear only daughters her husband remarries until he obtains
a son ; but Bogoras did not notice this as a rule, because a daughter can
replace a son veiy easily among reindeer-breeding people. He saw
some families consisting only of daughters— also in this case sons-in-law
may be adopted. Among the Maritime Chukchee, however, a girl
cannot replace a boy. (Op. cit., p. 601.)
* Ibid.
78 SOCIOLOGY
the Ijeavs let her go, with presents and incantations. She returns
home, and by means of their incantations succeeds in regaining
the favour of her husband, and persuades him to drive her rival
from the house. The latter perishes from hunger and cold.' '
Bogoras often saw women quarrel, and even fight, over the
favours of their husband.- Similar examples of jealousy are
described by Maydell.^
Supplcmentan/ Unions. The Chukchee form of supplementary
unions, called by Bogoras ' group-marriage ', sometimes consists of
ten couples. The husbands belonging to such a group are called
' companions in wives ' {nav-tnmgit). A man has a right to the
wives of all his companions, and may exercise this right when
visiting the camp of any one of them. The husband in this case
usually leaves the house for the night. In former times this
custom embraced only members of the same family, except
brothers ; but now friends, unrelated, may join such a group,
after which they become like relations, helping and sujiporting
each other. As in the case of individual marriage, a similar rite
is performed, consisting also in anointing each other with blood,
first in one camj) and then in the other, and sometimes the man
will even serve with the herd in order to be received into the
group.
People of unequal age and bachelors are not easily accepted.
People living in the same camp seldom unite themselves into
such a group, in which case, owing to the proximity of the tents,
the custom might easily develop into one of regular instead of
occasional intercourse. Poor people, however, who belong to
such a union sometimes live in one tent, it is said ; but Bogoras
did not himself see an example of this. Sometimes such unions
become polj^andry, if a bachelor is accepted as a companion.
Bogoras heard of certain cases in which each companion takes
the wife of another and lives with her for several months, or
even permanently. At the present time all Chukchee families
take part in such organizations. In some cases all men have
equal rights in each woman ; in other cases a man may have
several so-called marriage-companions, to whose wife he has a
right, while these companions do not possess the same rights with
regard to each other. Sometimes nowadays these unions are
entered upon without any rite. It is possible to break the tie
1 Op. cit., p. 601. 2 Op. cit., p. 602. ^ YqI i, p. 164.
MARRIAGE 79
which binds the union, but in practice this is not done, unless
there is a case of syphilis in the grouji. People of other tribes,
e. g. the Tungus, are also received into such unions, and also
Russians ; of course, in this case the Russians see in the custom
only an opportunity to profit by the loose conduct of women who
desire payment in the form of slaughtered reindeer. Such rela-
tions with the Eskimo have existed for a very long time, and
are undoubtedly due to trade intercourse ; and so the American
Eskimo has a temporary wife when visiting the Asiatic coast,
and the Chukchee when visiting the American shores.^
'These marital ties with strangers', says Bogoras, 'lead us to
the so-called "prostitution of hospitality ". It cannot be positively
ascertained whether in ancient times the custom existed among
the Chukchee. According to Russian accounts of ancient times,
it was customary for Russian merchants at the spring Chukchee
fairs to visit the rich maritime traders. They would bring with
them iron, kettles, tobacco in bags, and gave all this to the host
as a present. The host, in return, offered his Avife to the guests,
having first covered the sleeping place with beaver, fox, and
marten furs, numerous enough to cover the value of the present.
Nowadays no such custom exists.'- Cases in which the girl
accepts the guest willingly for some small present are considered
by the Chukchee as forms of supplementary marriage. Bogoras
says he was never offered hospitality -prostitution, but was often
asked to participate in what he calls ' group-marriage '.
After the death of one of several brothers, the next brother
succeeds him, and acts as husband to the woman and father to the
children, for whom he keeps the herd of the deceased. If the
woman is too old, he does not exercise his right of levirate, which
is here considered more as a duty than a right and only appertains
to the younger brother, cousin, or even nephew, and never to the
elder brother or uncle."
Bogoras says that his information about the Maritime Chukchee
is rather scanty. On the whole, however, the basis of marital
union among the Maritime Chukchee and the Asiatic Eskimo is
the same as among the Reindeer Chukchee. We find again the
marriage of near relatives, marriage by exchange between families,
woman for woman, and finally marriage with a strange family
' Op. cit., pp. 602 and 607. ^ Op. cit, p. 607.
' The custom of levirate is widespread among the Amerinds and the
Aleuts (Veniaminoff; Dall).
80 SOCIOLOGY
after a term of service. 'Group-marriage'^ and the levirate are
fully developed. -
The only difference between the marriage customs of the Maritime
and Keindeer Chukchee is that the former are seldom polygynous,
as they cannot support more than one family ; in their tales,
however, wo frequently find examples of polygyny.^' Tlie marriage-
rite among the Maritime tribe consists of sacrificing to the hearth
and, generally, anointing with red ochre instead of blood. When
Bogoras asked what marks the married couple painted on their
faces, he received the invariable reply, ' It makes no difference.' *
Perhaps they have themselves forgotten that it was in former
times, as it is now among the Reindeer Chukchee, the family
mark that is so painted.^
II. The Koryak.
Contrary to the custom of all neighbouring tribes, Koryak girls
must have no sexual intercourse before marriage. A young man
who serves for a girl who has violated this rule is ridiculed, and
her father and brother 'are angry', as the Koryak say." It is
considered shameful for a girl to bear a child before marriage ;
she must go out into the wilderness to be delivered, and after-
"wards she kills and buries the child. After she has reached
puberty, she must not remove her combination garment during
the night, especially when a stranger is in the house ; she must
^ The quotation marks indicate that I do not agree with Mr. Bogoras's
use of the term. The Chukchee form of supplementary union does not
correspond by any means exactly to any of the types of group-marriage
instanced by Prof. Westermarck in his History of Human Marriage.
^ ' In regard to the prostitution of hospitality, it should be said that
under the influence of American whalers, paid prostitution has developed
among all the Maritime peoples on both coasts of Bering Sea. During
the entire voyage, each ship has on board several young women from the
Asiatic or the American shore. I have witnessed how, on the arrival of an
Ameincan ship at the village Unisak, women in skin boats ai^proached
it from all sides, offering themselves quite openly. In order to be better
understood, they would press their hands to their cheeks and close their
eyes, s3'mbolizing sleei^.' (Bogoras, p. 610.)
^ Op. cit., p. 611. * Op. cit., p. 610.
' When dealing with marriage among the Chukchee, we have limited
our sources to Bogoras, because all other writers on the subject, namely.
Resin, Maydell, Augustynowicz, and Diachkoff, give us similar, but not
such exact descriptions. Thus Bogoras's writings include previous, as
well as his personal, observations. Our action is sanctioned by the fact
that such an authority as Maksimoff makes Bogoras the chief, if not the
exclusive, authority in his work, Conirihutiou to the History of the Family
among the Aborigines of Russia, 1902. p. 45.
« Jochelson, the Koryak, J. N. P. E., vol. vi, 1908, pp. 134-5.
MARRIAGE 81
hIso bphave distantly to the man who is serving for her, and
frequently she is sent away from home for that period.^ Dittmar -
says that a Koryak girl who has sexual intercourse before
marriage is shot by her fatlier. and similar statements are found
throughout the Koryak mythology/^
When taking the census of the Maritime and Reindeer Koryak
families. Jochelson did not find a single illegitimate child, while
among the Yukaghir, northern Tungus, northern Yakut, and
Russian settlers in northern Siberia, it was almost impossible to
find a fomily not including such children. The chastity of Koryak
girls is confirmed 'not only', says Jochelson, 'by the tales and
assertions of the Koryak themselves and from my impressions
obtained in Koryak homes, but also by the testimony of such
experts in love afl:airs as the Gishiga Cossacks.'^
Jochelson gives the following table of Marriage ProJiibitions (rela-
tives between whom marriage is forbidden are quite numerous and
may be divided into relatives by blood and relatives by affinity):
Blood-relatives. A man is forbidden to marry (1) his mother,
(2) daughter, (3) own sister, (4) cousin, (5) fathers sister, (6)
mother's sister, (7) brother's daughter, and (

own sister's
daughter. Between all other blood-relations marriages are per-
mitted. In answer to Jochelson's questions concerning second-
cousins, some Koryak replied that they did not consider them
relatives. 'From this the conclusion may be drawn that beyond
that degree no blood-relationship is recognized, but, on the other
hand, in direct ascending and descending lines, even very distant
degrees, such as great-grandfathers, great-grandmothers, and
great-grandchildren, are recognized as relatives.'
Iielafives bij Affinity. A man may not marry the following rela-
tives by affinity : (1) stepmother ; (2) sister of living wife
(i. e. simultaneously two sisters) ; (3) cousin of living wife (i. e.
simultaneously two cousins ; (4) younger brother's widow ; (5)
deceased wife's elder sister ; (6) nephew's widow ; (7) sister of
brother's wife (i. e. two brothers cannot marry two sisters) ;
(

cousin of brother's wife (i. e. two brothers cannot marry two
1 Ibid. 2 2)/e Kon'iken, p. 32.
' Krasheninnikoff (Description of the Country of Kamchatka, ed. 1786,
vol. ii, p. 163) mentions that among the Reindeer Koryak, the bride-
groom sleeps with his bride during the period of service, but as this is
not confirmed by any other authority it is probable that he has confused
them with the Chukchee. Even Krasheninnikoff states that at the
ceremony of seizure the bride's body is well wrapped up, (Ibid.)
* Jochelson, op. cit., p. 736.
1679 Q
82 SOCIOLOGY
cousins) ; (9) simultaneously an aunt and Lev niece ; (10) two
brothers cannot marry, one an aunt and the other her niece ;
(11) two male cousins cannot marry, one an aunt and the other
her niece ; (12) an uncle and nephew cannot marry two sisters,
two cousins, or two women of whom one is an aunt and the other
her niece; (13) a stej^-daughterJ
To Jochelson's questions concerning these prohibitions, one
Koryak said that ' relatives of the categories mentioned would die
soon if they should enter into cohabitation with one another'.^
At the same time, all our earlier evidence concerning the Koryak
seems to point to endogamic marriage. In the ' Description of
people living near Yakutsk, Okhotsk, and in Kamchatka',
compiled by the local administration circa 1780, but published in
1792, we read that the Koryak ' do not take wives from another
ord, and do not give their daughters for wives out of this ord, but
marry among themselves.''' Though the term ord is not defined,
one may suppose that it corresponds to a clan or local group.
The statement of Krasheninnikoff is similar : ' They take their
wives mostly from their own stock, first cousins, aunts, step-
mothers ; the only people whom they do not marry are sisters,
mothers, step-daughters.' "*
Jochelson '' himself asserts that in Koryak mythology only
marriage with a sister or a mother is held to be a crime, but there
are many instances of marriages between cousins. Thus we may
suppose that most of the marriage prohibitions are of later intro-
duction.
All ''' the authorities agree on this fact, that the bridegroom has
to serve his future father-in-law for a certain period and must
often undergo severe tests. No one of them makes any mention
of wife-purchase, or of the substitution of gifts or money for
service for a wife. On the contrary, Krasheninnikoff states that
the son-in-law, however rich he might be in reindeer, had to serve
for from three to five years. Bogorodski ' and Dittmar ® say that
if the man does not please his future father-in-law, he can be sent
away even after five or ten years without receiving any reward for his
1 Op. cit., pp. 736-7. 2 iijij 3 Op. cit., p. 395.
* Krasheninnikoff. ed. 1819, vol. ii, p. 221.
" Jochelson, op. cit., p. 738.
" Krasheninnikoff', ed. 1819,vol.ii,p.222; Lp.ssg^s, Eeise von Kamtschatka
nach Franl-reich, vol. ii, pp. 65 8 ; Kennan, pp. 152-5 ; Diachkoff,
p. 104.
^ Bogorodski, 1853, p. 109. '^ Dittmar, 1856, p. 25.
MARRIAGE 83
service. Maksimoff ^ thinks tli.at the custom of serving for the
bridle is the relic of a former custom by which a man went to live
2>ermanently in his father-in-law's house. As proof of his theory
he quotes the formula used in arranging a marriage, as given by
Yelistratoff.- The father of the suitor addresses the father of the
bride : ' I come to you, my friend, to assist my son in his court-
ship. Here you have my son I I give him to you — if you wish,
keep him as your son or as your workman.' Jochelson'' considers
that this custom of service provides a period of probation and test,
especially as the son-in-law is not treated so well as an ordinary
servant would be. ' The principal thought is not his usefulness,
but the hard and humiliating trials to which he is subjected.'
This opinion is confirmed by Koiyak tales.
In former times, not only the bridegroom but also his ' match-
maker ' was obliged to serve in the house of the bride.
Before the man enters the service of the father-in-law he has
chosen, the matchmaker, called by the Koryak " the asking one ',
entei's the home of the girl's father and the following dialogue
ensues : 'Here I have come!' 'What for?' 'I am looking for
a wife.' ' For whom ?' ' For So-and-so' (mentioning the name).
After some meditation, the host says: 'Well, we have girls, but
they are bad, later on you may yet scold us.' ' No, it is all right.'
' Then let him come, I will not harm him ' ; and in these words
the father gives his permission for the suitor to serve for his
dau2:hter. Very often the suitor goes to make the proposal
himself, especially if his parents disapprove of his choice. The
term of service varies from six months to three years, or even
longer, after which the father announces to the suitor that he may
take the girl to wife.'*
The marriage ceremony itself, which gives the husband full
right to his wife, is the act of 'seizing' his w'ife, described by all
our authorities with only slight variations. Most of them agree
with Jochelson that the bride must not surrender to the bride-
gi'oom without a struggle, nor will the bridegroom take her with-
out encountering the usual difficulties."' The bride is wrapped up
^ Maksimoff, op. cit., p. 47.
2 Yelistratoff, West Coast of Kamchatka, 1787, pp. 152-4.
' Jv)chelson, op. cit., p. 74. * Joclielson, op. cit., p. 739.
^ Jochelson {The Koryak, p. 742) quotes here Steller's explanation of
the origin of this custom. He thinks it is an imitation of animals — a bitch,
too, does not at once yield to the dog (Steller, Beschreibung von dem
Lande Kamtschatka, p. 347).
G 2
84 SOCIOLOGY
ill various garments which cannot be removod without cutting.
The bridegroom must attack lier, cut and tear off her clothes, and
touch her sexual organs with his hand. The girl herself resists,
and tries to run away, and besides this, her girl friends attack and
try to beat the bridegroom back ; and if tlie girl does not care for
the man she tries to hide among the neighbours, while her parents
endeavour to keep her at home.'
Kennan relates that on the marriage day the friends and rela-
tives are invited ; and, to tlie accompaniment of the drum and
songs, the bride runs round the yurta. The groom pursues her,
and at each corner is attacked by the women, who try to stop him
with their feet, and beat him unmercifully with branches of the
alder-tree. Finally the bride slackens her speed, or she would
not be caught at all. and then the man tears off her clothes and
touches her bod}'.^ Jochelson, on the other hand, says that
marriage is accompanied neither by feasts nor by shamanistic
ceremonies. Sometimes the couple leave at once for the bride-
groom's house, or they remain for some time still with her father.
In certain places the bridegroom, after successful ' bride-seizing ',
leaves at once for his home, and sends his parents or relatives to
fetch the bride. 'When the bride approaches the house of her
bridegroom's parents, the latter come out with firebrands taken
from the hearth to meet her.'^ The bride brings with her no
dowry, only her clothes ; but she brings some presents to the
bridegroom's mother and sisters. As soon as she enters the
hoiise she must prepare some meal. Among the Maritime Koiyak
this meal is eaten by the family, and among the Keindeer Koryak
this is followed by a sacrifice to the Supreme Being and his son
' the Cloudman ', the protector of married couples.
In former times there existed another rite called ' dyeing red ',
which consisted in anointing the bride's forehead and abdomen
with blood. After a certain time the 5'oung couple visit her
parents, and are again met with firelirands from the hearth, and
this time the bridegroom brings presents.
In certain rare cases it is the son-in-law who comes to live with
the bride's family. In such cases he is adopted into the family.
The young wife coming to tlie house of her husband must join
' In former times, apparently, not only the women but also the bride's
male relatives defended her from the groom (Jochelson, Tlte Korijah,
p. 743).
^ Kennan, op. cit., pp. 152-5. ^ Jochelson, 'Hie Koryak, p. 743.